Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | All Access e-Edition | Home RSS

Reed Surprises With Quick Decision

September 13, 2013

I am surprised and disappointed that our congressman, Rep....

« Back to Article

sort: oldest | newest




Sep-17-13 4:12 PM

Regulator do you still think Iraq had something to do with 9/11? If you do, you're wrong

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Sep-16-13 11:49 AM

I'm not surprised at all when any Republican exhibits a knee jerk reaction against anything that the president proposes.

1 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Sep-14-13 10:07 AM

You are surprised the republicans in Congress are partisan under all conditions? Where have you been all these years? At the Moscow airport terminal?

5 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Sep-14-13 9:54 AM

Not a surprise. Reed is a knee jerk anti Obama right winger. Doesn't think first. Just says what his bosses want him to say to get re-elected.

4 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Sep-13-13 10:44 PM

Thank You Carla 100% correct Mccain is only lobbying for his defense industry buddies not the people of Syria. You would have to be an idiot to use Chemical weapons, I would bet someone else sprayed them

2 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Sep-13-13 5:47 PM

Oh, how do people like Sammie and madman forget, I mean even if you forgot. It was in the paper yesterday. 9/11 we will never forget.

4 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Sep-13-13 12:25 PM

Duckster we learned that the Bush administration had no problem lying the people of the United States to get what they wanted.

9 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Sep-13-13 10:51 AM

what have we learned from Iraq?

2 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Sep-13-13 9:31 AM

He's like his great, great, great grand-pappy Harry. (You know the one...Harry and Nance babe)

2 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Sep-13-13 9:29 AM

To the writer; "Hope in one hand" and elect a democrat in the other, and see what you get.

4 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Sep-13-13 9:06 AM

Tom Reed's decision to not support a stupid war action is the same as Brian Higgins'. Which party was dictating?

4 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Sep-13-13 8:32 AM

Reed made his decision based on what the people of his district told him they wanted. NO WAR.

12 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Sep-13-13 8:09 AM

Why would America intervene in a coutry embroiled in a civil war that poses no threat to our national security? Reed has made the right decision.

14 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Sep-13-13 7:41 AM

As usual, now Fedup blames Mr Reed's decision on this President. So typical. Why not just say he made a good decision based on the fact this country is tired of the last 2 wars the former administration saddled us with.

7 Agrees | 8 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Sep-13-13 6:05 AM

How do you know what facts had been presented to Reed? Maybe he was well aware of how pointless any action would be after Obama's procrastination for many months and Obama's declared intention to not force regime change.

15 Agrees | 8 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Sep-13-13 5:47 AM

Maybe he bases his decision on the fact that only a moron would want a new war in the Middle East right now under any circumstances!

19 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Sep-13-13 4:29 AM

Maybe he is a politician that makes his decisions based on party politics. It saves all that time learning the facts and having to think.

14 Agrees | 12 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 17 of 17 comments

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
Remember my email address.


I am looking for:
News, Blogs & Events Web