Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | All Access e-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 

Binding Arbitration Panel Is Good First Step For State

June 25, 2013

One paragraph of a 2001 arbitration settlement between Jamestown and the Kendall Club Police Benevolent Association sums up the entire debate over binding arbitration....

« Back to Article

 
 
sort: oldest | newest

Comments

(2)

imfedup

Jun-25-13 5:32 AM

So what I'm hearing here is that if a City or Municipality is fiscally responsible and has accrued a fund balance greater than 5% of it's annual budget an arbitrator can award a settlement greater than it normally would. BUT WAIT, if the city has a fund balance, couldn't that be a result of OVER TAXATION of it's citizens in addition to fiscal responsibility. That fund balance is OUR money; we just sent too much to the taxing authority that year! And WE get punished for it. So let's go into a distress mode and we'll get smaller settlements? So very sad.

5 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

madman

Jun-25-13 7:50 AM

Honestly, binding arbitration has always been a joke, and it still is. Very rarely will you read about a case that he municipality won. The unions always win these arbitrations at the expense of the tax payers. So I question 1)the ability of the decision makers in these cases, and 2)why would a municipality even agree to binding arbitration knowing they are probably going to lose anyway? The whole system is corrupt, which is a reflection of today's lawyers and laws.

6 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 2 of 2 comments
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or
 
 

 

I am looking for:
in:
News, Blogs & Events Web