Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | All Access e-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 

Get Rid Of Unfair Income Taxes

April 21, 2013

To The Reader’s Forum: One hundred years ago, it was 400 pages. Now it totals 74,000 pages of rules and regulation....

« Back to Article

 
 
sort: oldest | newest

Comments

(169)

GioAllie

Apr-30-13 10:34 PM

even the righties are ignoring you---I read that somewhere........

0 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Seadog

Apr-28-13 3:25 PM

I Have no idea what you are talking about giogump. No religious slams from me. The only ones doing that are Todayalice with his/her sky daddy talk, and some of the rest of you nonbeliever friends.

2 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

GioAllie

Apr-28-13 2:22 PM

see dawg--can we please get back to the topic? --You were flushed sat. morn. for your offensive comments including a religious slam--apparently that's a no-no--for the good of the blog---I suggest you be a bit more careful in the future.

2 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Monkeyboy

Apr-28-13 1:48 PM

It looks like Mel's response is that churches get preferential treatment in the tax code but others get bigger exemptions so we shouldn't worry about churches being tax exempt. That's like saying one sin should be ignored because there are others that are worse. Churches and church property should be taxed like everyone else.

2 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Seadog

Apr-28-13 1:43 PM

I'm waiting giogump. How did I attacked someone's religious preference?

0 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Seadog

Apr-27-13 4:08 PM

Giogump, can you ever post something that makes sense?

1 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

GioAllie

Apr-27-13 1:01 PM

maddog and see dog seem to have become silent as of late----interesting. Their "bantering" and "off topic" concerns havn't gone well for them......

2 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Monkeyboy

Apr-27-13 12:34 PM

It looks like 50s4ever is on board for taxing the churches.

1 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

GioAllie

Apr-27-13 7:35 AM

maddog--you were saying.......

1 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

50s4ever

Apr-27-13 6:27 AM

Were there any black churches in the country who didn't promote Barack Obama? I doubt it. Some are famous for inviting America haters to speak.

2 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Pharyngula

Apr-26-13 10:55 PM

"Phar, I don't have a parsonage. I rent an apartment." I didn't intend for you to give out personal information but as you have, your rent is paid with pre-tax dollars? Wouldn't trying to bring a end to a tax exclusion that benefits a small minority of the population be a good way to show your sincerity for making the taxes more fair?

3 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Pharyngula

Apr-26-13 10:04 PM

"“It is difficult to imagine a greater entanglement with religion than this evaluation,” he wrote in his brief for the court.

Moreover, “the parsonage exemption is a subsidy for religion” and is therefore unconstitutional, he argued. Current Congressional budget records show that the exemption has cost the government as much as $500 million in tax revenue a year, shifting that much of the national tax burden onto other taxpayers."

2 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Pharyngula

Apr-26-13 10:03 PM

NYTimes "Professor Chemerinsky studied the relevant First Amendment case law, especially the 1989 case Texas Monthly v. Bullock in which the Supreme Court had drawn the line at government’s granting a “tax break to those who spread the gospel that it does not also give to others.” He urged the appeals court to find the tax break unconstitutional.

Under I.R.S. rules, he noted, this benefit is available to all clergy members who administer sacraments, conduct worship and direct the spiritual life of a religious institution. “The government thus has to determine what constitutes ‘sacraments,’ ‘religious worship’ and the ‘spiritual life’ of a religion and then to evaluate whether the clergy member is sufficiently engaged in these tasks,” Professor Chemerinsky continued."

2 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

apologeticsnow

Apr-26-13 8:51 PM

Lilrud, when you say, "At your STTPP meeting when Andy Goodell debated an empty chair. It seemed like a sermon to me. Did you not endorse Goodell?" how is that a sermon preached by me when Goodell is the one sitting there and his opponent refused to come? Secondly, it was not at a church but at the American Legion. So no church sponsored the event but it was sponsored by those who join together from any background for the freedom principles of the TEA Party. To insinuate that was sermon is a gross example of equivocation.

2 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

apologeticsnow

Apr-26-13 8:46 PM

Gio, what Democrat has a clear personal platform for lower taxes, less regulation, balanced budgets, lower deficits, diminished or eliminated unconstitutional bureaucracies and less spending and views the meaning of the Constitution in its original meaning of the words?

2 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

apologeticsnow

Apr-26-13 8:41 PM

Phar, I don't have a parsonage. I rent an apartment. The problem with the current system is that gopvernment picks and winners losers. I supopose even the parsonage exemption could be included in the winners package, along with the earned income tax credit and a whole host of other "winners" that government picks which far exceed whatever breaks a parsonage might get. I'm not at all in favor of window dressing whatever fairness government concocts for this bloated socialistic mess of taxation. Therefore, get rid of the entire income tax, the IRS and the 16th amendment as the decisive move toward justice in taxation.

2 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Monkeyboy

Apr-26-13 4:10 PM

And to Seadog, Mel and Loner, I'm flattered that you want to know my responses but you cannot always have immediate gratification. Unlike yourselves, I have a life with responsibilities and claims on my time. I cannot sit in front of a computer all day and post every thought I might possibly have immediately after you have written something. I'm happy for you that you have nothing better to do all day but my time here is limited.

1 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Monkeyboy

Apr-26-13 3:50 PM

Mel, how cute that you chastise me for not answering questions! You, being the man who never answers anybody's questions. If you and Loner were not so eager to look for some reason that you are being unfairly targeted, you might have noticed that I did not say any specific churches or religions. It should be ALL churches and religions and yes, we all know about Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and Wright and where did I say they should be exempted? Loner don't put words in my mouth.

3 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

GioAllie

Apr-26-13 2:27 PM

I will stand corrected but I doubt that that the local tparty patriots endorsed, or voted for, a single democrat candidate, from local politics to the national scene.

2 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Pharyngula

Apr-26-13 9:47 AM

Snow: I have tried to answer the question you ask of me, yet you do not even try to answer the questions I ask you. So I ask again. Does the parsonage exemption lead to a flatter or more fair tax system? You write about unfair taxes yet are unwilling to explain how a tax provision that you could benefit from at the expense of others is fair. Didn't the founder of your religion give stern warnings against hypocrisy?

3 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Lilrud

Apr-26-13 6:39 AM

At your STTPP meeting when Andy Goodell debated an empty chair. It seemed like a sermon to me. Did you not endorse Goodell?

2 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

apologeticsnow

Apr-25-13 11:50 PM

Sorry to Seadog for the misspelling on my part.

2 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

apologeticsnow

Apr-25-13 11:49 PM

Lilrud, when you say, That's why you don't see churches say to vote republicans during a sermon, except for Mel of course, they know the rules," that's an unsubstantiated opinion on your part. Give exact time, place and date when that was ever preached.

2 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Lilrud

Apr-25-13 9:38 PM

Seadog, do you not see the distinction between saying you are for civil rights and saying vote for Mitt Romney? How about running a local Tea Party group with signs that say America vs Obama? It's the politicking for a party rather than a cause that he shouldn't do.

4 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Seadog

Apr-25-13 9:04 PM

Lilrud, seems you forgot "the Reverned" Wright, "the Reverend" Jesse Jackson, and "the Reverend"Al Sharpton. Are you really expecting us to believe they are not political?

5 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 25 of 169 comments Show More Comments
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or
 
 

 

I am looking for:
in:
News, Blogs & Events Web