Sheriff Has Right Stand On Gun Bill

Yes it would seem that the Feb-07-13 3:38 PM post was.

1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

POINTLESS

0 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Yes they should* should have read

Yes there should

2 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Yes they should. Let us know if you ever come up with one of your own.

4 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

shoudn't arguments have a point? Well perhaps later in the discussion.

0 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

the braindead weak LEFT . adorable .

6 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Those that will be sheep do enjoy the herding. The rest of us will stock up load up and STAND.

5 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Those that abhor guns or are afraid of them need a shrink. 2nd Amendment leave it alone.

5 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

only stocking up and loading up. next dumb question.

5 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Critix, evey thought of seeing a SHRINK?

1 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

You got that right critix.

4 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Politicians wanting to legislate how many, how much, how big, this, that when the bad guys come calling. Oh wait a minute evil doers - I thought 2 max was all that would be attacking me tonight ! Let me get a count here - 1,2,3,4 of you ! whoa ! my legislative genuises didn't account for the unknown factor knowing the only evil act you have to worry about is . . the next 1.

4 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

PERFECT - the loneriderrr1 link

3 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

PERFECT

3 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

ht tp://images.search.yahoo.c om/search/images;_ylt=A0oG7kYtpg5RnWAAyFZXNyoA?p=semi+automatic+shotgun+with+Folding+or+telescoping+stock&fr=yfp-t-701&fr2=piv-web

Remove the spaces

3 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

And run away some where else ? Over half this country and states are full of Obama loving libs... this will be fought in ALL states,we just have to fight harder.****e on... we are in this together stand and fight,i dont run from my problems. Plenty of guns and ammo here.

3 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

If I thought I lived and worked and raised a family in the "laughing stock state," I'de pack up. Just my opinion.

0 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

THE LAUGHINGSTOCK STATE (renamed from the Empire State). With decisions such as you can only load 7 in your 10 round magazine. That bill provision will go down as 1 of the dumbest decisions in the history of mankind. The LAUGHINGSTOCK state.

8 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

munch chomp slurp as well as slobber& drool

1 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Grow it -----ht tp://cspoa.or g/sheriffs-gun-rights

3 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Alert: WAlmart sees huge increase in scissor sales after Homeland security tape. Coming soon background checks on all scissor sales..

6 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

"Sheriffs understand their Constitutional obligations and the concerns of constituents Sheriffs and other law enforcement officers are not called upon by this new legislation to go door-to-door to confiscate any weapons newly classified as assault weapons, and will not do so. Sheriffs represent all the people, and we take an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of New York. Sheriffs will continue to enforce all laws of the state and will protect the rights of all citizens, including those rights guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of New York"

5 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

And more "perform security duties at public facilities and events. • Method of bill passage. It is the view of the Sheriffs’ Association that anytime government decides it is necessary or desirable to test the boundaries of a constitutional right that it should only be done with caution and with great respect for those constitutional boundaries. Further, it should only be done if the benefit to be gained is so great and certain that it far outweighs the damage done by the constriction of individual liberty. While many of the provisions of the new law have surface appeal, it is far from certain that all, or even many, of them will have any significant effect in reducing gun violence, which is the presumed goal of all of us. Unfortunately the process used in adoption of this act did not permit the mature development of the arguments on either side of the debate, and thus many of the stakeholders in this important issue are left feeling ignored by their government."

5 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

"Even those thrilled with the passage of this legislation should be concerned about the process used to secure its passage, for the next time they may find themselves the victim of that same process"

8 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

More from the Sheriffs "• Reduction of ammunition magazine capacity. The new law enacts reductions in the maximum capacity of gun magazines. We believe based on our years of law enforcement experience that this will not reduce gun violence. The new law will unfairly limit the ability of law-abiding citizens to purchase firearms in New York. It bears repeating that it is our belief that the reduction of magazine capacity will not make New Yorkers or our communities safer."

6 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »