Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | All Access e-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 

Lawmakers Need To Be Thorough

January 28, 2013

During the weeks before the November presidential election, questions about the Sept. 11 attack that killed the U.S. ambassador to Libya and three other Americans came primarily from Republican....

« Back to Article

 
 
sort: oldest | newest

Comments

(87)

carlaw

Jan-28-13 5:40 AM

The press and the media is also at fault. They take sides instead of reporting the simple truth. The press by reporting the truth to the people, keeps our country free. What we have now is spin and propaganda on both sides. What ever happened to professionalism?

10 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

bobbybill

Jan-28-13 7:22 AM

Yes Carlaw right on the money. I like how FOX called out the worlds media for being one sided and unethical. Talk about the pot and the kettle.

3 Agrees | 11 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

50s4ever

Jan-28-13 7:30 AM

It sickens me the way Democrats become puppets when Clinton's name is mentioned. Suddenly their mouths all move with the same slobbering words of praise no matter what the question is. I couldn't bear to watch Her and Obama smoozing yesterday I was still wretching from the so called grilling of congress.

6 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

GioAllie

Jan-28-13 8:21 AM

Can someone point me to the evidence of this "cover up?" I thought so. Perhaps the next editorial on this issue could shed the "light."

5 Agrees | 7 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Aaron1

Jan-28-13 8:58 AM

Seadog has valid points and McCain and his friends in the Senate have every right to demand answers from the two who look like the cat who just ate the canary.

6 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

GioAllie

Jan-28-13 9:40 AM

every question asked in the 8:50am repetetive baseless accusations was asked, and answered by hillary, when allowed time to answer, or by written answer. However not to the satisfaction of the "cover up" conspiracy theorists. Another example of "why did we lose so badly?"

5 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

50s4ever

Jan-28-13 10:28 AM

Tell me allie, what did Clinton say about why for weeks the blame was put on a puny barely seen video instead of the real culprits? No democrat yet has answered that questin. They pretend the question is invalid, or the lies never took place. Deny, lie. Deny, lie. Lie, deny, lie, deny.

5 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

GioAllie

Jan-28-13 10:38 AM

the accusations made in the 10:28am and 10:10am posts are totally false -the record bears that out, but don't take my word for it--check out the transcript for yourself, without my assistance.

5 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

50s4ever

Jan-28-13 10:38 AM

I suppose you accept "what difference does it make" as an answer to who made that lie a talking point.

3 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

50s4ever

Jan-28-13 10:40 AM

Transcripts? You mean what I saw and heard was not real? I'll ask you. Who decided the blame would go to that video...since you evidently have info I don't, help me out here.

5 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

GioAllie

Jan-28-13 11:30 AM

kim guilfoyle and assoc. accused and convicted hillary of "faking a head trauma to avoid answering questions before congress." Apparantly that portion of the "cover-up" is a bit too embarrassing for some to discuss.

3 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

GioAllie

Jan-28-13 11:48 AM

the 11:41am and 11:12am comments reveal the intellect we deal with when interested in an intelligent exchange. The nature of the beast.

3 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Lilrud

Jan-28-13 12:01 PM

Gioallie, That is the intellect you have to deal with. You deal with it for awhile until it's pointless to argue.

3 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Howard

Jan-28-13 12:22 PM

Seadog, #1- Added security was denied to all embassy's (this was not an embassy, by the way) around the world by the republican house due to lack of funds. #2 - Completely, totally, untrue. #3 - Not true, they never concluded it was only the video as it was obviously a young and ongoing investigation. #4 - Again, totally false! Obama mentioned the video as a crude and disgusting video that sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world. He did not in any way tie the video to the attack during his UN speech. #5, if so, then what is wrong with that? There is a film - the government had nothing to do with it. There were protests against it so we denied having anything to do with it. #6 - Well, I don't know about this one - I guess you are right - Chuck Schumer must have all the survivors captive at his Lake Placid summer home.

2 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Howard

Jan-28-13 12:29 PM

There you go again (famous line by Ronald Reagan) - "What's it matter now" you are taking totally out of context! Listen to the whole answer, not just to 4 words. Republicans (especially Fox Noise is famous for this!)

2 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

50s4ever

Jan-28-13 1:31 PM

At this point in time, what does it matter, four aAmericans are dead" Is no answer to any question she was asked. It' another typical Clinton sidestep. "At this point in time, what does it matter" what kind of sex I lied about with whom Hillary? Love, Bill

2 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Howard

Jan-28-13 2:00 PM

Seadog, these are all facts, albeit, Schumer. That is all you can say? I have not watched MSNBC in a long time. I rebuked all of your comments and all you can do is mock a TV station. Way to debate, seadog.

2 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

GioAllie

Jan-28-13 2:42 PM

they couldn't beat the president, so they switched to hillary----"why oh why did we lose so badly, Karl." Both the 2:13pm and 2:16pm posts can be added to the long list of false, baseless accusations on this "theory." Wait for the personal attack mode, here it comes.

2 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

50s4ever

Jan-28-13 4:05 PM

Progs can't handle the truth.

3 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

duckster

Jan-28-13 4:16 PM

I am glad this urbane,mecca of clear thinking we call Chautauqua County has solved the Benghazi problem. Now we can all go back to Sean, Billy and Rush. wtf?

3 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

GioAllie

Jan-28-13 4:25 PM

everyone has the right to ask as many questions as they choose.I choose to ignore irrelevant type.

2 Agrees | 8 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

50s4ever

Jan-28-13 4:58 PM

Allie just killed another post of mine. Poor baby can't handle rejection of her superiority. Like I said...."that's your answer? Must be mentored by Hllary! Pull it again sweety, it feel good.

3 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

FedUpL8ly

Jan-28-13 5:31 PM

Gio- How can you claim Hillary answered all questions when I heard numerous responses of "I'll have to get back to you" and as for written answers, you have no clue as to how forthright her answers will be. Her and Barack were on 60 minutes for a photo op and to gratuitously praise each other. Gio, you totally defend all things Dem. so why don't you tell me why the guy who made the video is still in prison? Isn't he protected under the 1st Amendment? Even the leader of Libya said the video had nothing to do with the attack.

4 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

FedUpL8ly

Jan-28-13 5:41 PM

Also, Gio, Obama,Biden and Panetta were in a meeting together 50 minutes after the 7-hour attack started in Benghazi. One would have to be the dumbest person on the planet to believe they weren't fully informed of the attack. If the buck stops with Obama, he is the one responsible for not coming to rescue fellow Americans. Numerous military have testified that there was plenty of time to respond in various ways but it didn't jell with his campaign's talking points about Al-Quaeda being decimated. That's why Obama said the Seals deaths were "bumps in the road".

3 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Howard

Jan-29-13 10:05 AM

Seadog, please explain to me what is NOT a real time film. Film being the key word here. They did not watch this in real time, so you make up a new phrase called 'real-time film' to make it look like not only did they see it in real time but also knew exactly who, what, how and everything connected to this attack at the exact time as it was happening. That would be wonderful if we could pull that off. As far as Susan Rice, those interviews were the next day - no, nobody really knew what had transpired by then. There were protests against this film and they jumped the gun in giving that answer. That is the only mistake made by the administration. You have selective hearing also, Seadog as Hillary went on to explain about receiving millions of wires a year and can't, of course, read them all.

1 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 25 of 87 comments Show More Comments
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or
 
 

 

I am looking for:
in:
News, Blogs & Events Web